Brief: The Nature of Marriage
February 1, 2019
A Catholic perspective:
The TCCB supports policies that recognize the sacredness, fidelity, and permanency of marriage. Families, which are the fundamental unit of a healthy society, are created and maintained through marriage. As such, the U.S. Bishops have written: “We are a society built on the strength of our families, called to defend marriage and offer moral and economic supports for family life.” Such a call rests upon the Catholic Church’s teaching that the two principal purposes of marriage are the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of children. In accord with this twofold purpose, the Church recognizes that marriage is a union of a man and a woman for the whole of life.
The U.S. Supreme Court, for its part, has reduced marriage to friendship by jettisoning the twofold purpose. Nevertheless, marriage remains distinct from friendship and so we do not tire of maintaining: “Children have a basic right, wherever possible, to know and be loved by their mother and father together. The law has a duty to support every child in this most basic right.” By nature, the role of parents in procreation cannot be replaced and the role of parents in education is invaluable. As such, civil law should encourage and support families by:
- maintaining the freedom to establish a family and educate children in keeping with the family’s own moral and religious convictions;
- maintaining the freedom to profess one’s faith, hand it on, and raise one’s children in it;
- promoting access to medical care and aid for the elderly in keeping with our institutions;
- maintaining access to private property, free enterprise, and opportunities to obtain work and housing, as well as the right to emigrate;
- countering dangers to a family’s security and health, including drugs and pornography;
- promoting the formation of free associations between families; and
- supporting the recruitment, formation, and support of foster and adoptive parents.
 USCCB, Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship. 9. For helpful reflections on the communicative, moral, religious, and spiritual aspects of marriage, see Amy Kass and Leon Kass, Wing to Wing, Oar to Oar. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2000).
 See Griswold v. Connecticut for the definition (Page 381 U.S. 486 (1965)) which was echoed in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015). If marriage is akin to friendship, a definition that requires lifelong commitment or requires one man and one woman appears arbitrary, capricious, or mean.
 TCCB, Statement by Texas Catholic Conference on Supreme Court ‘Same-Sex Marriage’ Ruling. June 27, 2015.
 CDF, Donum Vitae [Instruction on Respect for Human Life in Its Origin]. II.A.1, 7.
We are called to defend
marriage and offer families
moral and economic support.
Texas law and policy:
The Family Code contains our state’s marriage laws and defines the main public policy goals of Texas marriage law, which includes providing stability for those entering into marriage and an orderly determination of parentage and security for children. Furthermore, the Family Code outlines the main requirements to receive a marriage license, including an age requirement, waiting period, and a process of solemnization with a religious or judicial official.
Additionally, Texas is one of the handful of states that also permits common law marriage. Common law marriage can be recognized by the State if the spouses agree to be married, live together as husband and wife, and hold out to others that they are married. Finally, while Texas’ laws do not allow for same-sex marriage, that statute is currently unenforceable due to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges. Nevertheless, Texas law does protect the religious liberty of certain organizations and persons from recognizing or performing marriages that conflict with their sincerely held religious beliefs.
While social science confirms that marriage offers benefits to the members of each family, Figure 1 illustrates that the marriage rate in Texas has steadily been declining over the last four decades. The state government attributes multiple factors to this downward trend in marriage rates: the age structure of the population, the trend of postponement of marriage, and the growing incidence of many young adults opting to cohabit prior to—or rather than—getting married.
In response to these challenging trends, the TCCB supports laws that recognize the true nature of marriage and seek the well-being of spouses and children. In the Catholic view, the family is the original cell of social life; it is the foundation for social freedom, security, and fraternity. Because families are a child’s first education, our state will go where our families lead.
- HB 922 requires that both parties to marriage agree to the insupportability of the marriage in order to grant a no-fault divorce. The TCCB supports this bill as an incremental improvement that promotes the sacredness, fidelity, and permanency of marriage by reducing the use of no-fault divorce against the objections of a spouse.
- HB 926 establishes a six-month waiting period for no-fault divorce in marriages with minor or school age children or disabled adult children. The TCCB supports this bill which is an incremental improvement in protecting the permanency of marriage in families with children.
- HB 938 allows unmarried minors who are mothers to consent to medical treatment related to contraception. The TCCB opposes this bill because it interferes in parental rights.
- HB 978 / SB 153 would change laws referring to man and woman and husbands and wives to gender-neutral terminology in marriage documents. The TCCB opposes this bill which would erode the sacredness, fidelity, and permanence of marriage.
- HB 980 / SB 152 revises sexual education materials such that homosexual conduct would be taught to be acceptable. The TCCB opposes this bill because it would promote gender ideology among children and subvert parental rights.
- SJR 9 would repeal the constitutional amendment limiting marriage to one man and one woman. The TCCB opposes this constitutional amendment which contradicts the nature of marriage.